Government databases collect personal information for various reasons (mass surveillance, Schengen Information System in the European Union, social security, statistics, etc.).
Contents |
The Homeless Individuals and Families Information System was created in 1995. The Government Electronic Directory Services (GEDS) provide a directory of Canadian federal public servants for all regions across Canada.
The legislative body of the European Union passed the Data Retention Directive on 2005-12-15. It requires telecommunication operators to implement mass surveillance of the general public through retention of metadata on telecommunications and to keep the collected data at the disposal of various governmental bodies for substantially long times. Access to this information is not required to be limited to investigation of serious crimes, nor is a warrant required for access.
During World War II, the Gestapo arrested activists of the Communist Party of Belgium (Julien Lahaut, Jean Terfve...) with the assistance of Belgian governmental databases.
Today, 450 000 persons have had their fingerprints taken.
The Det Centrale Personregister, established in 1968, contains information concerning the name, address, Danish personal identification number, date and place of birth, citizenship and other associated information. Virtually every government agency in Denmark receives information about a person from this database.
King Louis XIV had put in place a system of surveillance of craftsmen in the 17th century. Napoleon then put in place the "Workers' Booklet" (Livret ouvrier) without which a worker could not travel. Before World War I, the Third Republic had put in place the Carnet B on which all left-wing activists (trade-unionists, anarchists, socialists, etc.) were registered. Léon Jouhaux or Victor Pengam were on that list. They were to be arrested in the event of a war, as the government feared that the left-wing would oppose itself to the war. However, after Jean Jaurès's assassination a few days before the war and the rallying of most of the left-wing to the Union sacrée (Sacred Union) government, the Carnet B was not used to detain individuals.
In the interwar period, police officer André Tulard set up a database registering communists and others activists. The "Tulard database" was then used under Vichy to register Jews. These files were handed out to Theodor Dannecker of the Gestapo, and greatly assisted the French police in carrying out raids against Jews, who were then interned at Drancy camp before being deported to concentration camps in Nazi Germany.
Furthermore, during the war, René Carmille created what would become the INSEE code used as a Social Security number. The CNIL agency, in charge of respect of civil rights and informatic liberties, was created after the revelation, in 1974, of a government databases called SAFARI. Databases are supposed to have the CNIL's approbation before being authorized.
In 1995 the STIC (Système de traitement des infractions constatées) was unformally created. It registered both criminal offenders and plaintiffs. In January 1997 it registered 2,5 million offenders and 2,7 million victims.[1] The STIC was legalized only in 2001.[1] The Gendarmerie, which depends of the Interior Minister, has a similar database called JUDEX (2,2 millions persons in 2003.[2] The STIC today registers 24,4 millions persons, and the maximum conservation length of information is of 40 years. It has lifted several controversies, as some people have not been able to find jobs because they were registered on the STIC (sometimes wrongly, others simply as victims). In 2005 the CNIL discovered a rate of 47% of errors included in the STIC database.[2]
In 1998 the FNAEG, registering DNA information, was created by the Plural Left government of Lionel Jospin, with the authorization of the CNIL organism in charge of informatic freedom issues. First used to register sex offenders, it has since been extended to cover almost any crime, including those opposing themselves through civil disobedience to genetically modified food (GMO). The FNAEG today registers 400,000 genetic prints, and encounters rising opposition.
In 2004 the Fichier judiciaire automatisé des auteurs d'infractions sexuelles, dependent of the Justice Minister, has been created to register sex offenders.
The same year, the National Assembly voted the loi pour la confiance dans l'économie numérique to implement the Electronic Commerce EU directive. This law will force all Internet Service Providers (ISP), phone operators, webmasters, etc., to keep information on visitors (codewords, VISA cards numbers, pseudonyms, contributions on forums and blogs, etc.) for at least a year (and up to three years). The information would be accessible for the RG domestic intelligence agency, counter-intelligence agencies, the judicial police (PJ) and investigative magistrates.
Since September 2005, twenty one Departments are experimenting the Base-élèves (Students-Base) system, which registers children aged 3 and more. It registers for the time being address, phone numbers, nationalities, etc.
In 2006, the then Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy created the ELOI database to register foreigners and illegal aliens. But the Conseil d'État deemed the arrêté (close to a decree) illegal.
The CNIL controlled police computer records in 2006, and found more than a half of mistakes which it had to correct.[3]
Sarkozy's government issued a decree on 7 August 2007 to generalize a voluntary biometric profiling program of travellers in airports. The program, called Parafes, was to use fingerprints. The new database would be interconnected with the Schengen Information System (SIS) as well as with a national database of wanted persons (FPR). The CNIL protested against this new decree, opposing itself to the recording of fingerprints and to the interconnection between the SIS and the FPR.[4]
In autumn 2009, the French Parliament will examine and vote (very probably) a law called Loppsi[5] which permit the creation of a informatic platform connecting all the Government databases. [6] · [7]
The Stasi in East Germany collected information on thousands of citizens. In West Germany, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz domestic intelligence agency has also collected data since the 1970s, first in the frame of anti-terrorist legislation and the struggle against the Baader Group. 80% of the individuals registered by the RFA belong to the left or the far-left, 10% to the far-right and 10% are registered as "undesirables".[8]
The Secret files scandal in 1989 revealed that over 900,000 people had been registered by the Bundespolizei. With a population of approximately 7 million, that meant almost one citizen out of every seven had been put under surveillance[9]
DNA databases were created in 2002 by the National Council.
The British Police hold records of 5.5 million fingerprints and over 3.4 million DNA samples on the National DNA Database. There is increasing use of roadside fingerprinting - using new police powers to check identity. Concerns have been raised over the unregulated use of biometrics in schools, affecting children as young as three.
In London, the Oyster card payment system [1] can track the movement of individual people through the public transport system, although an anonymous option is available, while the London congestion charge uses computer imaging to track car number plates.
In 2002 the UK government announced plans to extend the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, so that at least 28 government departments would be given powers to browse citizens' web, email, telephone and fax records, without a warrant and without a subject's knowledge. Public and security authorities made a total of 440,000 requests to monitor people's phone and internet use in 2005-2006.
In 2004 the Information Commissioner, talking about the proposed British national identity database gave a warning of this, stating, "My anxiety is that we don't sleepwalk into a surveillance society." Other databases causing him concern are the National Child Database, the Office for National Statistics' Citizen Information Project, and the NHS National Programme for IT.
In 2004[update] it was estimated [2] that the United Kingdom was monitored by over four million CCTV cameras, some with a facial recognition capacity, with practically all town centres under surveillance. Serious concerns have been raised that the facial biometric information which will be stored on a central database through the ID Card scheme could be linked to facial recognition systems and state-owned CCTV cameras to identify individuals anywhere in the UK, or even to compile a database of wanted citizens' movements without their knowledge or consent. Currently, in the City of Westminster, microphones are being fitted next to CCTV cameras. Westminster council claims that they are simply part of an initiative against urban noise, and will not "be used to snoop", but comments from a council spokesman appear to imply that they have been deliberately designed to capture an audio stream alongside the video stream, rather than simply reporting noise levels. [3]
Across the country efforts are underway to increasingly closely track all road vehicle movements, initially using a nationwide network of roadside cameras connected to automatic number plate recognition systems ("Project Laser"). In the longer term mandatory onboard vehicle telematics systems are also suggested, to facilitate road charging (see vehicle excise duty).
In 2008 plans were being made to collect data on people's phone, e-mail and web-browsing habits and were expected to be included in the Communications Data Bill. The "giant database" would include telephone numbers dialed, the websites visited and addresses to which e-mails are sent "but not the content of e-mails or telephone conversations."[10][11]
The SORM (and SORM-2) laws enable complete monitoring of any communication, electronic or traditional, by eight state agencies, without warrant.